<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: DDoS tracking WG
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:36:33 +0100
At the RIPE meeting last week more than one participant observed that there is a need for reform of (at least) the EOF in order to attract more "router people" to RIPE and the meetings. In the meantime feel free to use the EOF list for discussion on operationally relevant topics. It is an open list. On the subject of DDoS mitigation: This is more complex than it looks. I remember an effort 10 years ago to improve NOC-NOC communications in general and to facilitate the exchange of tickets in particluar. The people involved were all well-meaning and very enthousiastic. Still it was not very successful. At the end-of-the-day a NOC will listen to its customers and talk with its peers (most of the time). Any attempt to break that pattern is an up-hill struggle. It may be worthwhile but it needs to be very convincing to stand a chance. Still there are areas worth improving: - general alert on major events - facilitate peer-peer communication - ?????? Both RIPE (the chair) and the RIPE NCC are looking for people to liven up the EOF and tackle worthwhile things. A few of us are also collecting high quality technical presentations for the Barcelona meeting in May. Daniel
- Post To The List:
- References:
- RE: DDoS tracking WG
- From: Christian Panigl, ACOnet/VIX/UniVie
- RE: DDoS tracking WG
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |