From enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de Tue Jan 24 23:30:33 2012 From: enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de (Carsten Schiefner) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:30:33 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 Message-ID: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> Dear colleagues, first of all, on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs I wish you all a Happy New 2012! ENUM-wise, it didn't start too bad: we have already been able to see the announcement of XConnect and DE-CIX wrt. an NGN/VoIP communications exchange where one core component is ENUM: http://www.xconnect.net/german-federation/ In case you havn't yet read about it, please find below what some news portals have to say about it; the last two articles are in German. Best regards, Carsten Schiefner on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs === XConnect, DE-CIX plan NGN/VoIP communications exchange http://www.telecompaper.com/news/xconnect-de-cix-plan-ngnvoip-communications-exchange XConnect Announces Partnership with Germany's DE-CIX http://www.voipmonitor.net/2012/01/17/XConnect+Announces+Partnership+With+Germanys+DECIX.aspx XConnect Announces Major Partnership with DE-CIX to Create Germany's First Next Generation Network/VoIP Communications Exchange http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/xconnect-announces-major-partnership-with-de-cix-to-create-germanys-first-next-generation-networkvoip-communications-exchange-137558298.html XConnect, DE-CIX partner on first nextgen networkVoIP federation in Germany http://www.fierceenterprisecommunications.com/story/xconnect-de-cix-partner-first-nextgen-networkvoip-federation-germany/2012-01-18 XConnect Forms Partnership with DE-CIX to Create Next Generation Network/VoIP Communications Exchange in Germany http://www.techzone360.com/news/2012/01/23/6069085.htm Deutscher Internetknoten baut VoIP- und Videotelefonie-Netz auf http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Deutscher-Internetknoten-baut-VoIP-und-Videotelefonie-Netz-auf-1416780.html DE-CIX und XConnect vereinbaren Technologie-Partnerschaft http://www.portel.de/nc/nachricht/artikel/55753-de-cix-und-xconnect-vereinbaren-technologie-partnerschaft/996/ From ag at ag-projects.com Tue Jan 24 23:44:14 2012 From: ag at ag-projects.com (Adrian Georgescu) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:44:14 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 In-Reply-To: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> References: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> Message-ID: <9042CA75-4CD2-44F1-A2F6-D34209A243E2@ag-projects.com> Hi Carsten, Another one is emerging. A carrier ENUM database mandated by a regulator? http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r120119.htm Adrian On Jan 24, 2012, at 11:30 PM, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > first of all, on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs I wish you all a Happy > New 2012! > > ENUM-wise, it didn't start too bad: we have already been able to see the > announcement of XConnect and DE-CIX wrt. an NGN/VoIP communications > exchange where one core component is ENUM: > > http://www.xconnect.net/german-federation/ > > In case you havn't yet read about it, please find below what some news > portals have to say about it; the last two articles are in German. > > Best regards, > > Carsten Schiefner > on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs > > === > > XConnect, DE-CIX plan NGN/VoIP communications exchange > http://www.telecompaper.com/news/xconnect-de-cix-plan-ngnvoip-communications-exchange > > XConnect Announces Partnership with Germany's DE-CIX > http://www.voipmonitor.net/2012/01/17/XConnect+Announces+Partnership+With+Germanys+DECIX.aspx > > XConnect Announces Major Partnership with DE-CIX to Create Germany's > First Next Generation Network/VoIP Communications Exchange > http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/xconnect-announces-major-partnership-with-de-cix-to-create-germanys-first-next-generation-networkvoip-communications-exchange-137558298.html > > XConnect, DE-CIX partner on first nextgen networkVoIP federation in Germany > http://www.fierceenterprisecommunications.com/story/xconnect-de-cix-partner-first-nextgen-networkvoip-federation-germany/2012-01-18 > > XConnect Forms Partnership with DE-CIX to Create Next Generation > Network/VoIP Communications Exchange in Germany > http://www.techzone360.com/news/2012/01/23/6069085.htm > > Deutscher Internetknoten baut VoIP- und Videotelefonie-Netz auf > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Deutscher-Internetknoten-baut-VoIP-und-Videotelefonie-Netz-auf-1416780.html > > DE-CIX und XConnect vereinbaren Technologie-Partnerschaft > http://www.portel.de/nc/nachricht/artikel/55753-de-cix-und-xconnect-vereinbaren-technologie-partnerschaft/996/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richard at shockey.us Tue Jan 24 23:53:05 2012 From: richard at shockey.us (Richard Shockey) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:53:05 -0500 Subject: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 In-Reply-To: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> References: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> Message-ID: <019b01ccdaea$ef8b0690$cea113b0$@us> Its gets MUCH better... See paragraph 69-70. http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r120119.htm -----Original Message----- From: enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Carsten Schiefner Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:31 PM To: enum-wg at ripe.net Subject: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 Dear colleagues, first of all, on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs I wish you all a Happy New 2012! ENUM-wise, it didn't start too bad: we have already been able to see the announcement of XConnect and DE-CIX wrt. an NGN/VoIP communications exchange where one core component is ENUM: http://www.xconnect.net/german-federation/ In case you havn't yet read about it, please find below what some news portals have to say about it; the last two articles are in German. Best regards, Carsten Schiefner on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs === XConnect, DE-CIX plan NGN/VoIP communications exchange http://www.telecompaper.com/news/xconnect-de-cix-plan-ngnvoip-communications -exchange XConnect Announces Partnership with Germany's DE-CIX http://www.voipmonitor.net/2012/01/17/XConnect+Announces+Partnership+With+Ge rmanys+DECIX.aspx XConnect Announces Major Partnership with DE-CIX to Create Germany's First Next Generation Network/VoIP Communications Exchange http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/xconnect-announces-major-partnership -with-de-cix-to-create-germanys-first-next-generation-networkvoip-communicat ions-exchange-137558298.html XConnect, DE-CIX partner on first nextgen networkVoIP federation in Germany http://www.fierceenterprisecommunications.com/story/xconnect-de-cix-partner- first-nextgen-networkvoip-federation-germany/2012-01-18 XConnect Forms Partnership with DE-CIX to Create Next Generation Network/VoIP Communications Exchange in Germany http://www.techzone360.com/news/2012/01/23/6069085.htm Deutscher Internetknoten baut VoIP- und Videotelefonie-Netz auf http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Deutscher-Internetknoten-baut-VoIP-un d-Videotelefonie-Netz-auf-1416780.html DE-CIX und XConnect vereinbaren Technologie-Partnerschaft http://www.portel.de/nc/nachricht/artikel/55753-de-cix-und-xconnect-vereinba ren-technologie-partnerschaft/996/ From enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de Wed Jan 25 00:10:30 2012 From: enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de (Carsten Schiefner) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:10:30 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 In-Reply-To: <019b01ccdaea$ef8b0690$cea113b0$@us> References: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> <019b01ccdaea$ef8b0690$cea113b0$@us> Message-ID: <4F1F3A66.6010605@schiefner.de> Hi Richard, do you mean: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2012/2012-24.htm instead, perhaps? Best, Carsten Am 24.01.2012 23:53, schrieb Richard Shockey: > Its gets MUCH better... See paragraph 69-70. > > > http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r120119.htm From richard at shockey.us Wed Jan 25 01:22:25 2012 From: richard at shockey.us (Richard Shockey) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:22:25 -0500 Subject: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 In-Reply-To: <4F1F3A66.6010605@schiefner.de> References: <4F1F3109.6040801@schiefner.de> <019b01ccdaea$ef8b0690$cea113b0$@us> <4F1F3A66.6010605@schiefner.de> Message-ID: <01e801ccdaf7$6b4b5c60$41e21520$@us> Yes .. that is the formal order which is linked at the bottom of the other link.. -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Schiefner [mailto:enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 6:11 PM To: Richard Shockey Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [enum-wg] Infrastructure ENUM developments in Germany/.de/+49 Hi Richard, do you mean: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2012/2012-24.htm instead, perhaps? Best, Carsten Am 24.01.2012 23:53, schrieb Richard Shockey: > Its gets MUCH better... See paragraph 69-70. > > > http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r120119.htm From denis at ripe.net Tue Jan 31 17:17:05 2012 From: denis at ripe.net (Denis Walker) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:17:05 +0100 Subject: [enum-wg] Forward DOMAIN Object Cleanup and Syntax Changes Message-ID: <4F281401.4050407@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear colleagues, At RIPE 57, the RIPE NCC was asked to remove all forward domain data from the RIPE Database. The last two ccTLD operators' data was removed today, 31 January 2011. The RIPE NCC can now confirm the completion of action point AP57.2 from the RIPE Database Working Group. At RIPE 62, the RIPE NCC was asked to look at the attributes in DOMAIN objects. With the removal of any hierarchy in reverse delegations and the removal of forward domain data, we no longer see any use case for the "mnt-lower:" attribute. Other attributes that it has been suggested were used only for forward domains are: - "refer:" - "sub-dom:" - "dom-net:" The statistics listed at the bottom of this email show how many of these attributes have been added to ENUM and reverse delegation DOMAIN objects. It has also been suggested that the "nserver:" optional attribute could be made a "required" attribute in reverse delegation DOMAIN objects. It could remain optional in ENUM DOMAIN objects or it could be disallowed. The RIPE NCC asked the community in July 2011 if anyone saw any justification for the use of these attributes in ENUM or reverse delegation DOMAIN objects. We did not receive any feedback on this. If there is no justification, the syntax of the DOMAIN object can be adjusted to deprecate these attributes. Then all current DOMAIN objects in the RIPE Database can be "cleaned" to remove this data. Business rules can be added to make the "nserver:" attribute required or disallowed in different types of DOMAIN objects, if this is considered useful. To keep the discussion focused, please send any comments or feedback to the DNS Working Group mailing list. Regards, Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Group Statistics (as at July 2011) ---------- Number of each attribute used in reverse delegations or ENUMs and the number of unique maintainers who manage these objects. "refer:" = 6 unique maintainers = 1 "sub-dom:" = 271 unique maintainers = 23 "dom-net:" = 2,219 unique maintainers = 140 "mnt-lower:" = 46,485 unique maintainers = 4,208