<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: ENUM domain names in Poland

  • To: Carsten Schiefner < >
  • From: "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" < >
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:39:42 +0100
  • Cc:

On 31 Mar 2004, at 10:00 am, Carsten Schiefner wrote:

Hi Patrik,

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= wrote:
I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.

My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format for
a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.
as in:

http://www.noris.net/cgi-bin/dig? fqdn=2.5.4.1.4.5.8.0.3.9.4.e164.arpa&type=AXFR&server=toybox.amsterdamn ed.org

? Don't know whether I got the prios/prefs right, though...

-C.

Hi Folks,
I sympathise with the mess we're in due to the glacial progress of RFC2916bis.
(BTW, I think the order/pref are correct in the example).
This example will work fine, but it does mean we double the size of the DNS reply.

Thus it's only "easy" for those folks having a single contact - remember that
some of the old clients only use UDP queries (without EDNS0 support).

atb,
Lawrence




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>