<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:06:37 -0400
At 08:57 PM 10/24/2002 +0100, Paul M. Kane wrote:
Hi Richard Hope all is well with you......
now they got the DC shooter, very well thank you !
Just a question - if you don't propose to use DNSSEC - how are you proposing to prevent DNS spoofing??we're are in basic agreement here .. DNSSEC _will be_ useful _at some point in time_ in the ENUM context but it still in early trials ..has not deployed in the TLD's and mandating it at this time is not a good idea.
This discussion is about ENUM trials not DNSSEC trials. IMHO the two should not be "joined at the hip".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
Voice +1 571.434.5651 Cell : +1 314.503.0640, Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<> or <>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
- Post To The List:
- References:
- Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials
- From: Jim Reid
- Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials
- From: Paul M. Kane
- Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |