[dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Fri Oct 16 19:41:58 CEST 2009
Jim, >>> Now us technical people realise those claims are beyond ridiculous. >> Actually, no. It _is_ technically possible to have tens of millions of names in the root (or any other zone). > David, you're playing with words. You referenced a paper written by ICANN staff, implying that in that paper ICANN staff was saying "let's move COM to the root". All I was saying is that that was not what the paper said. I even pointed out that the paper makes a distinction between what is technically feasible and what is operationally feasible. Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]