Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1993 13:52:12 +0100
>To get back on this one once more, I think an omission IS a mismatch, and
>that is why a warning is generated right now. If you would have left the
>bdrygw-l in (an it would be the same) you would get no warning.
thanks for still considering it!
I'm getting the impression that we maybe could handle it by documenting
_how it actually_ works. Probably there is more important things to do than
"fixing" this one in software?