Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1993 16:11:13 +0100
> You did NOT include the bdrygw-l field in your entry you sent in,
> so the software tells you it has added that line, which is correct
> in my view.
let's keep this in mind: we are discussing more or less cosmetics and sw
philosophy, it doesn't impede the *very* successful use of the new DB-sw...
Under this disclaimer - I still feel that I shouldn't get a warning for
omitting an attribute _that I'm not supposed or allowed_ to maintain!
But of course I can get used to it :-)
>I will look at the error as soon as I can, probably after the IETF next week.
>Maybe Daniel will have it fixed in the mean time.
thanks a lot!