Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute

• To: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
• From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1993 00:22:23 +0100

  > "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" woeber@localhost writes:
  >    DB-folks,
  > 
  >    I just submitted an object -containing a bdrygw-l: attribute- in order t
  > o
  >    change the connect: attribute. To avoid getting cute warnings I just
  >    _omitted_ the bdrygw-l: line altogether. Nevertheless, the warning was
  >    generated (see below).
  > 
  >    From my point of view, it would be more natural to not send diagnostics 
  > if
  >    a guarded attribute does match exactly or is omitted altogether.
  >    Warning(s) should be generted only if there is a mismatch.

You are perfectly right. This is how it should work.

Goes on the to-be-fixed list.

Daniel

• Post To The List:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute
    • From: Marten Terpstra
  • Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute
    • From: Marten Terpstra