[ca-tf] Proposal 2008-08 v2

another very short comment - any process which relies upon revocation as 
a procedure for routine system operation will not fly (i have told it 
many times already).
Or one should _mandate_ the usage of OCSP, which will not fly either.

dol@

14.09.2010 14:24, Dmitry Burkov пишет:
> very short and concise - from first point of view no misenterpretation can happened.
> anyway - seems we should discuss the scope
>
>
> dima
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 14.09.2010, at 13:12, Nigel Titley<nigel.titley at uk.easynet.net>  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Folks
>>
>> Please find attached my attempt at version 2 of the certification policy
>> for your comments.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>> <2008-08-v2.txt>
>