delayed mail (was :Re: [ca-tf] 2008-08)

All,

I just found this delayed mail in my mailbox. On investigating,
it turns out to have been stuck in the moderator's box, while
the staff member moderating was on sick leave.

We will see to improve procedures.

just to let you know,

Axel



On 06/05/2010 16:53, Nigel Titley wrote:
> OK, now that some of the heat has died down and I've looked back on the
> session I would say that we had a certain amount of consensus for the
> following statements (and thank you Daniel for posing my first question
> in a less loaded form. There wasn't actually an intent to make it
> loaded)
>
> 1. Certificates should reflect the state of the registry
> 2. Certificates should be revoked when address space is reclaimed (or
> returned)
>
> Now, in my book, we are very close to version 1 of the policy and with
> some word-smithing, to remove the loaded "business relationship" aspects
> of the policy and to emphasise the reflection of the registry state I
> think we may get some community consensus.
>
> With your Lordships'/Ladyships' permissions I'll try and do this and
> circulate to this list. Does that suit?
>
> Nigel
>
>
>