[ca-tf] Certification-Policy Proposal - next steps?
Gert Doering gert at space.net
Mon Mar 22 16:45:56 CET 2010
Hi, On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:32:02AM +0000, Nigel Titley wrote: > Well, I don't see any consensus for the policy proposal as originally > proposed Definitely not... > and I'm happy to withdraw it ... but I don't think that this should be the right way. I'd go for "v2.0" of the proposal that incorporates clear words to address the issues voiced by the community. > and just continue with the > technical implementation, but this begs the question of how we implement > certification from a business perspective. Do we just offer it as a > service that any RIPE NCC member can avail themselves of? How long will > certificates last? Do we with withdraw them when a member leaves? All > the questions that came up during the policy debate still need > answering. That's why I think a "v2.0" of the proposal with some answers to that makes sense. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 150584 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ca-tf/attachments/20100322/446fb009/attachment.bin
[ Ca-tf Archive ]