[ca-tf] Certification-Policy Proposal - next steps?

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:32:02AM +0000, Nigel Titley wrote:
> Well, I don't see any consensus for the policy proposal as originally
> proposed 

Definitely not...

> and I'm happy to withdraw it 

... but I don't think that this should be the right way.  I'd go for
"v2.0" of the proposal that incorporates clear words to address the
issues voiced by the community.

> and just continue with the
> technical implementation, but this begs the question of how we implement
> certification from a business perspective. Do we just offer it as a
> service that any RIPE NCC member can avail themselves of? How long will
> certificates last? Do we with withdraw them when a member leaves? All
> the questions that came up during the policy debate still need
> answering.

That's why I think a "v2.0" of the proposal with some answers to that
makes sense.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  150584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ca-tf/attachments/20100322/446fb009/attachment.bin