[ca-tf] last version of the Certification Proposal
Robert Kisteleki robert at ripe.net
Sun Oct 5 18:09:11 CEST 2008
I second this - I like the current contents. I have only one note: personally I'm not in favor of explicitly mentioning the LIR portal as *the* secure communication channel, as that seems to be more like an implementation issue. But, as I said, I'm also OK if it stays as it is now. Cheers, Robert Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Short and sweet. This should be proposed. > > Daniel > > In my version of english it is "in line" and not inline.
[ Ca-tf Archive ]