[anti-spam-wg] RE: anti-spam-wg digest, Vol 1 #273 - 5 msgs

  • From: "Thor Kottelin" thor@localhost
  • Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:14:17 +0300
  • Organization: Turvasana Tmi - Safety Words, http://www.anta.net/sw/

> From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" michele@localhost
> To: "anti-spam-wg@localhost" anti-spam-wg@localhost
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:28:05 +0100

> On 11/04/2008 10:22, "JT Adelphia" tucker77@localhost wrote:

> > My servers ip was recently erroneously blacklisted in an 
> sbl listing.  Th=
> e
> > other ips in the listed range I have no control over.  This 
> is having a v=
> ery
> > negative effect on my business.

Hi,

JT Adelphia, are you sure you gave us the correct address?

208.70.78.94 is not listed in the SBL

208.70.78.94 is not listed in the PBL

208.70.78.94 is not listed in the XBL

Actually, 208.70.78.94 is not even a RIPE address.

> > Someone should help me to resolve this before my losses 
> become so great I=
>  am
> > forced to seek the help of an attorney.
> 
> And how is an attorney going to help you?

Perhaps JT Adelphia was thinking of suing his provider for selling tainted
address space..?

Regards,

-- 
Thor Kottelin
http://www.anta.net/