<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
- From: peter h peter@localhost
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 10:41:58 +0200
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 12.38, Jim Reid wrote: > Can we please take this discussion elsewhere? The current thread is > off-topic for this list and seems to be opening up an infinite number > of rat-holes. > > I disagree. This list _is_ about spam elemination. And bad habits from registries does only help spammers hide. Same goes for ISP that ignores abuse-reports and ISP that act's like drug dealers when accepting money from spammers. If the above two issues could be eleminated spam would be much less of a problem. So, how do we force regestries to present accurate information ? And how do we encourage ISP to keep spammers off their nets ? -- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
- From: Jim Reid
- RE: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
- From: Jørgen Hovland
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
- From: Esa
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
- From: Jim Reid
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |