<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus
- From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:01:48 +0200
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie" michele@localhost
Emanuele Balla wrote:Using greylisting alone will be soon almost unuseful.Maybe, but it's stopping a lot of junk for us :)
Our customers call 2 minutes after sending the email asking why it hasn't been delivered to the recipient. To solve that we now send bounce warnings for all 4xx attempts the first time. Now they call instead and ask what greylisting means.....argh the pain.
j
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon:: Blacknight.ie
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Sabri Berisha
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Paul Wouters
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
- [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Emanuele Balla
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |