<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Emanuele Balla balla@localhost
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:00:06 +0200
Peter Dambier wrote: > As most blacklists ban dynamic ip-addresses I cannot use them, nor can > my customers. [...] > With blacklists you close out the legal users but you keep the spam. > With greylists you may dely a legal user but you do keep out the spam. Crap. There are DNSBLs with the explicit goal to list dynamic IPs, as well as others list known spammers machines, and others listing abused machines. Which one are you speaking about, if you even know what a DNSBL is? Seems to me you just speak to hear the sound of your voice.
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon:: Blacknight.ie
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Sabri Berisha
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |