Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:02:32 +0200
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:46:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kurt Jaeger:
> > Additional comments from those against using the DNS RR RP ?
> Not really an argument against RP, but merely an observation: if you
> delegate the reverse zone, you automatically delegate authority for
> the RP RR, too. This can be dealt with proper policies, I believe,
> and to some extent, it is even an advantage over IRT objects (a fair
> number of mnt-irt: references have been introduced in legacy address
> space without prior consent from the inetnum: object owners).
Maybe, I want to delegate reverse to the customer, but want to keep an eye
on the abuse complaints they're generating and this is where IRT or other
mechanisms come in handy.