Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois

• To: Markus Stumpf < >
• From: Florian Weimer < >
• Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:43:18 +0200
• Cc:

* Markus Stumpf:

> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:07:40PM +0200, Patrick Oonk wrote:
>> Apart from the fact that the RP record is a good and simple method, it 
>> does not seem to work in BIND 9. Using the example at 
>> http://soa.granitecanyon.com/pexample.html I created a RP record
>> 
>> mydomain.com	IN	RP	abuse.mydomain.com.
>
> a RP RR takes two arguments. You want to write
>   mydomain.com	IN	RP	abuse.mydomain.com. .
> The second argument is an optional reference to another RR like
>     example.com.  IN	RP	abuse.example.com. abuse.people.example.com.
>     abuse.people.example.com. IN TXT "Abuse Dept, phone: 555-1234"

Another thing to check: Do caching resolvers process CNAMEs properly
when queried for RP records?

• Post To The List:
  • Post a response to this mail
  • Post a new topic

• References:
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Rodney Tillotson
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: MarcoH
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Kurt Jaeger
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Gert Doering
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Patrick Oonk
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Markus Stumpf