<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
[anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:14:01 +0100
Sabri Berisha sabri@localhost writes: > Perhaps you'd be better of adding this to the IRT objects? > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-254.html Isn't the IRT object dead? Personally, I think it's more important to require functional (!) email (!) contacts for inetnum objects (and allocate the necessary manpower to be able to investigate reports of broken addresses)). Of course, this is whishful thinking because no one is going to pay for the work involved.
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact
- From: Sebastian Willing
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact
- References:
- [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Abuse contact
- From: Sebastian Willing
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Abuse contact
- From: Sabri Berisha
- [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Abuse contact
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |