RE: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Contacts

• From: "Chris Jones" < >
• Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:16:30 -0000
• Cc: "'der Mouse'" < >

> -----Original Message-----
> From: anti-spam-wg-admin@localhost
> [
	    
	    

> Behalf Of der Mouse
> Sent: 03 February 2003 10:22
> Subject: Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Contacts
>
> No, but it _is_ your job to make sure the address sapce you have been
> assigned is not used irresponsibly.  If you don't require your
> customers to maintain working contacts, you must take on that function
> yourself; anything less is irresponsible.  (Which was where
> we came in;
> the RIPE NCC as not only being irresponsible in this respect but is
> strongly resisting fixing it.)

I think that you will find that both ARIN and APNIC take the same view as
RIPE in this respect, although APNIC do chase their customers perhaps a
little harder than the other two, and this DOES work. Another example of
Jeffrey's "carrot and stick" methodology actually working.

--
From
Chris Jones
mailto: chris@localhost
web: http://www.telespan.co.uk/

My PGP Key:-
RSA 2048/1024     Key ID:  0x2B1F1593
Fingerprint:  B073 FE31 0A6A 6BD6 C4DB  750D 2B30 D0E7 2B1F 1593

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Contacts
    • From: der Mouse