Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Contacts
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:48:31 +0200
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Third, how many lawsuits do you think any RIR can financially take?
> And do you think it's successor will handle in as good faith as the
> RIR's now?
If there isn't a binding requirement in the contract to supply
functional contact addresses for the allocated netblocks, surely there
is a method to amend the contract?
Actually, keeping information up-to-date is already the responsibility
of the LIR (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/new-lir.html#21). If not
written into the contract, well, it has to be written there.
And so, if RIR has a binding contract with LIR, well, it is LIRs problem
if a customer gets cranky. RIRs butt is covered.
> And shooting them off the net is not the solution cowboy :)
Any pointers to the real solution?
esa
