<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: automated spam detection
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:31:44 +0100
Think the discussion about recognizing spam should focuss on the definition of spam. In the end I think it will be concluded that there is no sound definition of spam. In this context: unsolicited *and unwanted* commercial e-mail. Only way is content-filtering, and that's not an option to me. Not only not an option, but [now or later] rightout illegal. And from a legal point of view any general form of filtering by an ISP - and perhaps even AUP's that forbid UCE - may be a violation of the constitutional right of freedom of speech and freedom of press. That might well be the reason why the EC Directive is a bit "reluctant". Piet
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: automated spam detection
- From: Xlink Abuse Task Force
- Re: automated spam detection
- From: Rudi van Houten
- Re: automated spam detection
- References:
- Re: automated spam detection
- From: Jan Meijer
- Re: automated spam detection
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |