Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce

• To: Piet Beertema < >
• From: Ulf Vedenbrant < >
• Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:07:49 +0100 (MET)
• Cc:

On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Piet Beertema wrote:

>     With e-mail, it is ultimately the recipient who pays
> True, but that goes for *any* unsolicited e-mail,
> not only for unsolicited *commercial* e-mail.
> 
>     and with continued abuse it is probable that some means
>     of shifting the cost towards the sender will find favour.
> Agreed. Would *you* dare to come up with a global
> scheme for 'sender pays' charging though?

If we had "sender pays" we would not have this discussion..

/Uffe

• Post To The List:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce, mike.norris@localhost, Piet Beertema <Piet.Beertema@localhost
    • From: Dave Wilson
  • Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce
    • From: Claudio Allocchio +39 040 3758523

• References:
  • Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce
    • From: Piet Beertema