[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:32:19PM +0200, Denis Walker wrote:

Dear Denis

> Again you are right. The abuse contact is not special. It only seems 
> special because we have applied the principles of the database model to it. 
> These principles are sadly missing from so many other areas of the data.
>
> Although it has been forgotten after 10+ years the basic database model is  
> - an organisation is the core of your data. That organisation has human 
> resources and Internet resources. The human resources are grouped into 
> roles and these roles manage the Internet resources. That is it in a 
> nutshell. It sounds simple, but so many layers have been built on and 
> around these principles, that the original principles have been partially 
> lost.
>
> That core organisation is anyone/thing that manages (some aspect of) an 
> Internet resource. If it is an outsourced 24/7 team, an abuse handler or an 
> End User doing their own routing. There should be an ORGANISATION object to 
> identify them. Everything else hangs off that object.

So, do we have to start thinking about making admin-c/tech-c of
INET(6)NUM (and others) optional and then deprecated at some point in
time? Do we have to start thinking about moving whole contact details to
the ORGANISATION objects?

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl