[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66
Jørgen Hovland jorgen at hovland.cx
Wed Mar 6 12:15:04 CET 2013
On 03/06/13 11:48, Brian Nisbet wrote: > Ronald, > Ronald F. Guilmette wrote the following on 05/03/2013 20:36: >> In message <5135CE73.9030500 at heanet.ie>, >> Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >> >>> This is the draft agenda for the RIPE 66 meeting... >> >> No agenda item about defining (or refining the definition of) "abuse"? > > Nope. > >> I'd like to just reiterate my view that all other activities of this WG >> will be utterly fruitless until such time as a reasonable, rational, and >> generally accepted definition of "abuse" is in hand. > > I genuinely don't think it will be useful to spend time on this. I > think an attempt to get a consensual definition of abuse would take > the whole of the session in Dublin and every session thereafter and > after all that time, I still don't think we would have got anywhere. > If the rest of the WG disagrees with me, then we can raise it, but if > n = the number of people in the WG, I fear we would have n + 1 > definitions. > I am pretty sure it will take until the end of the world to agree on a definition. Perhaps even longer.