[anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Jun 21 18:14:26 CEST 2013
Sasha/Nigel, Nigel Titley wrote the following on 21/06/2013 17:03: > Sascha > >>> I'm not sure about an untimely demise, per se. The NCC, nor the members >>> of the NCC, have no power over the WGs, but it would > >> Strictly speaking, the membership can, in Plenary, disband the WG. >> Also, ISTR a WG chair being "fired" in Plenary a few years ago... > > Sorry to be pedantic, but the "membership" (usually understood to be the members of the RIPE NCC) have no power over a WG. I think you may mean the "community", which does. YEs, this is why I explicitly stated the members of the NCC. The community is a whole different matter. > And the WG chair who was fired (in Rome if I recall correctly) was actually fired by his own WG, not the plenary. I believe that is a fair retelling of the incident. Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]