[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Jun 20 15:16:51 CEST 2013
Sascha Luck wrote the following on 20/06/2013 14:10: > Hi Brian, > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:08:03PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> The second may be that while these companies may be legitimate >> businesses the NCC is aware of the local law and says, "Ah, no, we >> know, for a fact, that you are mandated to use these resources for >> network abuse, therefore your application is invalid." > > Hmmm. That raises an interesting question: What *does* the NCC > consider "network abuse" and grounds to deny an, otherwise legitimate, > request? I was not aware that the RAs even have this option... Please note the word "may". We're still talking hypotheticals and I doubt this would be the decision of just one IPRA. I would also not presume to speak for the NCC. Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]