[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jun 19 13:12:09 CEST 2013
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, furio ercolessi wrote: > My main point was in the second half of the post, and concerned > the meaning of "invalid resources", their long lifetime, the fact that > the current system is favoring people that lie about resource usage, > while in fact the opposite should be the case. > > This is correct - and actionable metrics should be straightforward to provide. What remains is policy proposals that are effective in getting such allocation requests denied and/or revoked. Which seems to be more of a can of worms here than in any other RIR. --srs -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130619/147d600d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]