[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Jul 2 13:47:46 CEST 2013
Hi, On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:28:31AM +0200, Gilles Massen wrote: > My use case is to set a specific abuse-c for one autnum and inetnum, > which is not the same as the general abuse-c of the organisation. Maybe > I could create a 'fake' ORG in order to link to that (probably it would > not work in my case), but that means data duplication. Allowing to > attach the abuse-c to whatever object would solve it more nicely. The > DBs query logic should hardly be affected as it is simply a matter of > returning the most specific abuse-c for the object. I seem to remember that I stated this as well, back then, and it was not seen as "important". So, yes, seconded. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130702/77066f23/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]