[anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Jan 21 12:53:02 CET 2013
In message <40A6A1EE-5F5B-46A3-ACFE-17F69F24EDB1 at steffann.nl>, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: >> Perhaps something more like a couple of checkboxes on the complaint = >form >> which say: >> >> [ ] I wish this complaint to be public. >> [ ] I wish my name to be included in the public report. >> >> This way we could have an opt-in public archive of all abuse reports >> that the RIPE NCC has received. > >Even better! Then we also have an input/output view on the RIPE NCC >fraud/complaint handling procedure. Ummmm... no. Apparently there is some confusion here. Let me try to clear that up. As I understand it, RIPE has contractual confidentiality commitments that are of such a nature that RIPE will _never_ say _anything_ about _any_ aspect of its handling of _any_ abuse report. Period full stop. For that reason, you will *not* ``get an input/output view'' on the process. No person outside of RIPE staff will _ever_ see _any_ ``output''. That's the problem. Putting an extra check box on a report form isn't going to change that. I hope that we are clear on this now. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]