[anti-abuse-wg] WG: 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)

Hi all,

(citing from the proposal)
> The RIPE NCC will handle all such reports and update the state accordingly.

What I miss, is a state like 'closed, violation took place, ressource
not (yet) returned'
Otherwise it looks like the whole "returning" comes down to listing
the ressource in the 'returned'-file.
What happens if the ressource holder is "guilty" but does not want to
return the ressources? Does returning mean, we all stop
peering/announcing/whatever with the listed ressources? How can we
re-allocate the ressources, when someone still uses it (against the
ruling of RIPE NCC)?
These questions are more technically, because I haven't understood
fully how the whole process is meant to work.

For the sake of transparency, I'd like to see
- Date submitted;
- The resources the report is about;
- A short summary from RIPE NCC (2-3 lines) [not the initial report]
published for alle reports that have the state 'closed,resources-returned'.

Furthermore, if the ressource holder agrees, we should publish
'closed,no violation', 'closed,out of scope', 'closed,resolved by
holder' reports, too. Just to make sure that subsequent reports will
not report the same issue again and again.

Best regards

Dan

-- 
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de