[anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/current policy (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/AAWG charter (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/current policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Feb 9 21:33:24 CET 2013
In message <5116686A.8020208 at heanet.ie>, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >Ronald F. Guilmette wrote, On 08/02/2013 20:07: >> >> It would appear that a newer revision of this document exists: >> >> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-541 > >Sorry, my mistake, I picked the wrong version. 541 has also been updated: > >https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-578 > >Can you just check your questions still apply to this version? Yes, they still do apply. I would still like to know why Section B.1.b apparently says that RIPE NCC _might_ reclaim the improperly allocated resources whereas Section B.1.e says quite clearly that RIPE NCC "will" reclaim the resources. Again, my question is: Was this difference in wording intentional and deliberate? Or was it inadvertant and unintended? Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/AAWG charter (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/current policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]