[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c mandatory
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c implementation schedule
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: NCC#2012103307 abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Altpeter
frank at altpeter.de
Mon Oct 22 10:23:08 CEST 2012
Moin, on 2012-10-22 at 10:10:26 CEST, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Which, considering what nobody implies, is a lovely way to circumvent the > grand intentions this proposal has. Talk about leading horses to water > versus making them drink The last time I tried to update my handle, the auto-dbm told me that the field "abuse-c" is unknown and rejected the update. So I'm waiting for a notice that the technical details for using the abuse-c field is available. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Frank Altpeter -- FA-RIPE || http://www.altpeter.de/ || http://gplus.to/frank42 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20121022/fdf2bc79/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c implementation schedule
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: NCC#2012103307 abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]