[anti-abuse-wg] Counterfeit shops pres follow-up

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> On Tuesday, October 9, 2012, Shane Kerr wrote:
> 
> 
>>And I didn't see anything about limiting discussion or work to issues
>>related to the RIPE NCC.
>>
>>I think that the working group is free to discuss anything the
>>participants want to, as long as it is related to abuse on the
>>Internet.
>>
>>
> 
> Sure.  I could think of a few other more relevant abuse focused forums to
> raise this in, where you might actually see some good come out of sharing
> the data.

I agree.
Like e.g. FIRST, as it obviously involves parties scattered around the world.

>  Perhaps not in a group of, by and large, people with IP
> allocation / db / dns type backgrounds as opposed to security and abuse
> mitigation.

Correct. Although I think it is not a bad idea to get those people involved,
too. It is a matter of expectation - and good will -, on both sides, I guess...

> --srs

Wilfried.