[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 16:47:02 CEST 2012
And I think most countries - not sure about the netherlands - make it "know or ought to have known" Which is where due diligence, know your customer norms etc come in for bankers. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Vissers, Pepijn <P.Vissers at opta.nl> wrote: > > There's a difference between 'knowing' and 'suspecting'. And if a > company/person knowingly facilitates crime, it could be 'complicity'. Under > circumstances. > > It's another nice busy day here @anti-abuse. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/feda1e91/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]