[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Mon Mar 26 18:45:57 CEST 2012
* Reza Farzan: > If your statement--Email contact information is optional, is correct, how do > people contact a network regarding the abuse violations that were originated > from their IP address? > By calling them? Or, writing a letter using the postal service? This is > simply ridiculous. Usually, you don't care about contact, you want them to take some sort of action as well. > RIPE must create a revised policy regarding e-mail contact for networks > listing within RIPE database to ensure accountability. There is no relationship between the two, one way or the other. All PA resources can be traced back to a legal entity which has submitted proof of its existence to RIPE NCC. For PI resources, the status is less clear, but I can't tell if this is an issue in practice. And there are countries (curiously, not the ones you would expect) where forming a limited liability company is so easy and cheap that accountability is seriously impacted.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]