[anti-abuse-wg] meeting minutes

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:11:45PM -0400, lists at help.org wrote:

> understand what is going on.  Right now they are cryptic and they do not 
> identify the actual issues at hand and don't achieve the goal of 
> allowing people the opportunity to see what is going on.

I disagree with this assessment.  The minutes are detailed and, to
my reading, reflect the session well. They list statements, facts,
and actions.  Minutes do not provide conclusions or speculation,
therefore I'd appreciate if you took the time to re-read and
clearly state the deficiencies you perceive instead of using terms
like "cryptic" without substantiation.
And for that matter, approval of the minutes does not imply happiness with
either the content or the result of the meeting.

-Peter