[anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Jun 1 12:16:06 CEST 2012
Hello, "lists at help.org" wrote the following on 01/06/2012 10:06: > I am interested in information about security and privacy of whois > databases (domains and IP addresses). For instance, the legal > authorities associated with the warning banners, blocking schemes and > other limitations placed on the data. As well as court decisions, > official rulings, etc. as it relates to privacy laws (including the > packaging and resale of historical data). Also any working groups, etc. > involving whois. The information is being compiled at > http://WhoisSecurity.com While this list does not require introductions or anything of the sort, it is always nice to at least have a name for a poster. Like I said, it isn't required, but it might facilitate discussion if people had some idea who they're talking to, if that makes any sense? This is especially useful when you're asking such a broad question. Anyway, aside from that, the current position in the RIPE Region is given here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/tf/dp/report-of-the-ripe-data-protection-task-force and https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/support/documentation/legal-framework-and-procedures-proposed-by-the-data-protection-task-force However at the RIPE meeting in Ljubljana (RIPE 65), the RIPE NCC were asked to take another look at this and I hope to be able to update the WG soon on timelines for this 2nd look. Brian, Co-chair, RIPE AA-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]