[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Jul 31 19:57:23 CEST 2012
Hi Denis, Denis Walker <denis at ripe.net>: [...] > As I follow these discussion my mind keeps focussing on the Abuse Finder > tool and the technical nightmare we have right now in trying to make > that work. One of the many problems with it is we cannot parse remarks > that (may) include abuse contacts. I think you have highlighted a fundamental issue with the design of RIPE database objects. They include data that is specifically for human consumption in objects that are structured so they can be parsed by software. I do not know what the best way to combine software parsable database objects and human readability is but recognise that this is not the Database WG list and that I am not a database expert. Regards, Leo Vegoda -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120731/2180c812/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]