[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Leo Vegoda leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Jul 31 15:54:46 CEST 2012
Hi Tobias, On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:33 am, Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com> wrote: […] > No. We had that conversations already and decided not to accept web > addresses only. The reason is, that automatic reporting can not be done > with web addresses. Assuming you mean something accessible over HTTP or HTTPS, it does not have to be accessed by a person using a browser. If there was a widely adopted API, I can see the value in a URL for some kind of RESTful service for automatic reports that do not require human involvement. Regards, Leo Vegoda -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4359 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120731/faf67099/attachment.bin
