[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Mon Jul 30 09:02:28 CEST 2012
lists at help.org wrote: > I think you need to first develop 2 tables (working with other > groups/RIR's). Across the top is the RIR's. The first tables should list > the data fields and the second table list the queries and what data > elements they return. Then you can see what the RIR's all have in common > and explain the differences/reasons in the elements of the table. Then > look at what is common among the RIR's and come up with a standard. Then > you can focus on the individual elements and decide what to do with the > eventual goal being a common standard among all RIR's. Sounds resonable, but is really somthing for the db-wg or another place where this worldwide RFC could be developed. Feel free to send a proposal, its defny welcome. > To get over the opt-in/opt-out law differences you could consider > allowing "private" instead the real data, allow a link to a form web > page rather than a contact person, or demand an opt-in agreement when > the data is collected, etc. I cant really see, why a development of a new whois standard needs to be first, until then I would focus on the mandatory field to help abuse reporting and the cleanup of RIPEs database. Kind regards, Frank -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]