[anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
Wed Jul 25 14:20:57 CEST 2012
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Tobias Knecht > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:04 PM > To: Alessandro Vesely; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > The point I would > make > here is, that there are techniques in place that can separate > reports > and that can proof authentication and that abuse departments can or > should use them I agree, especially as many reporters anyhow seem to use every @-containing string their Whois lookup returns. -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]