[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whats wrong in Kazakhstan ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian
ripe-wg-antiabuse at kyubu.de
Wed Apr 25 13:43:34 CEST 2012
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:00:54PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Suresh, > The fun part here is - that disclaimer in the whois says "any email > sent to contacts other than abuse@ will be treated as spam and may > expose the sender to legal action" > > They just said the magic words where I, as an employee, must then step > back and NOT do that - because, remote though the chance is that > they're going to sue IBM because I reported spam to another address as > their abuse address is non functional, I cannot and will not run the > risk of exposing my employer to any litigation. There is no need to contact chello.pl. :) Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whats wrong in Kazakhstan ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]