[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Wed Apr 25 10:59:50 CEST 2012
hi! On 04/25/2012 10:33 AM, Frank Gadegast wrote: > Surely you cannot force any member to work against abuse, but > we can improve the accuracy of the contacts of those, that > do like it. [...] > was really complicated and intense, it would be helpful, > if RIPE NCC would have a technical validation, simply > because they have better ways to contact their members, > and their members probably listen to RIPE NCC quicker > than to any complainant. i sense some dissonance here. anyway. if you wish to check objects for a form you don't like (like 'no optional email attribute') and subsequently inform the responsible person of what you think about your findings - i don't see what stops you. if you just walk up to me and tell me i have to do it for you - well: no, you can do that yourself. regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]