[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 15:31:29 CET 2011
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > A LIR should have the technical know-how etc., to manage requests etc., in a cost-effective manner > A lot of the organisations that take PI space probably don't .. PI space normally argues a specific need such as multihoming, or portability across ISPs. Any organization that has the technical knowhow to do this ... Any ISP can allocate a /24 to a customer with a T3 or a rack of servers - but does that space necessarily need to be PI? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]