[anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Mar 9 15:02:22 CET 2011
In message <4D777E1A.2010303 at powerweb.de>, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: >Maybe RIPE should introduce real votes, where 50% are enough to accept >drafts. I was not aware that this is NOT currently the case. So, um, let me see if a get this... At this point in time, the folks in Egypt have a more democratic system in place than RIPE does. Is that about the size of it? >Just want to add my opinion here: >its quite stupid to maintain sender domains in blacklists, because >sender domains are usually faked anyway. I can only agree, and that's why I don't ``maintain sender domains in blacklists''. If you assumed that I did, then you assumed wrong. (Sorry. I don't have time to provide a tutorial about Received: headers, reverse DNS, and mail filtering just now. Maybe later.) Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]