[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 13:15:15 CEST 2011
Thanks for making that clear - but maybe fighting fire with fire isnt going to work here. Can we turn back to the question that was actually riased in the thread? 1. A complaint mechanism 2. Sources for RIPE NCC to do proactive research on misallocations / hijacks On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > I wasn't the one that said "RIPE is ... responsible for any abuse". > > I just tried to point out how ridiculous that is. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]