[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Dave CROCKER dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Dec 19 17:11:35 CET 2011
On 12/19/2011 5:30 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > But that isn't any reason to tar all spam filtering with the same brush. Perhaps you are underestimating some people's requirement for absolute perfection in the world? (Their version of perfection, not yours or mine, of course...) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
