[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Tue Dec 13 20:24:28 CET 2011
On 13/Dec/11 12:39, Laura Cobley wrote: > > We are working on improving the procedures and documentation in the > area of reporting abuse. As part of this work, we have already > rewritten the FAQs currently being discussed on this list. > > We will inform you as soon as the revised FAQs are published. Thank you so much! It is quite curious that this WG shouldn't able to suggest an adequate wording...
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]