[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
Mon Dec 12 22:13:27 CET 2011
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Joe St Sauver > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 9:22 PM > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > When I look at http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-hacking- > spamming/ > I'd probably write something that looks quite a bit different than > what's > currently there. The suggestions that followed are excellent. Thank you. (Proposal snipped due to its length but available at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2011-December/001161.html.) -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]